Profile

CAREER SUMMARY

Lindsey Bayman, Esq. is a mediator with a strong track record of resolving complex civil disputes, particularly in the areas of employment, sexual assault and misconduct, entertainment, business litigation, and personal injury. She is widely regarded by counsel as well prepared, strategic, and effective in moving difficult cases to resolution, especially those involving high emotion, reputational risk, or entrenched positions.

Ms. Bayman brings to mediation a rare and valuable background shaped by decades of high-stakes negotiation and decision-making as a senior entertainment industry executive. Her professional experience sharpened her ability to assess leverage, evaluate real-world risk, and guide parties through pressure-filled negotiations—skills that directly inform her approach as a mediator. To Ms. Bayman, mediation is not an abstract exercise; it is a disciplined process of helping parties realistically reassess their positions as facts develop and litigation risk evolves.

She began her legal career at Dentons, practicing in London and later Los Angeles, before moving in-house at major media companies. She ultimately spent nearly a decade as Executive Vice President of Motion Picture Business Affairs at Paramount Pictures, where she negotiated complex, multi-million-dollar agreements and managed sensitive matters involving sophisticated stakeholders. That experience honed her ability to read dynamics, manage messaging, and understand how power, timing, and risk influence outcomes—skills she now deploys daily in mediation.

In addition, Ms. Bayman supervised significant litigation as an executive, giving her a practical, business-grounded understanding of how litigated cases evolve, where pressure points arise, and why cases either settle or stall. That perspective deepened further when she joined the plaintiffs’ trial team in the landmark Aliso Canyon natural gas blowout litigation. Her work on that matter earned her recognition as a finalist for Consumer Attorneys of California’s 2022 Consumer Attorney of the Year, and gave her first-hand experience with large-scale, emotionally charged litigation involving substantial exposure and public scrutiny.

As a mediator, Ms. Bayman is known for rigorous preparation. She carefully reviews briefs, typically speaks with counsel in advance, and tailors her approach to the personalities and dynamics of each case. While generally evaluative, she is thoughtful and deliberate in how and when she provides candid feedback. Counsel frequently note her ability to help parties step back from fixed litigation mindsets and reframe positions that no longer align with the developing facts, legal risk, or economic realities of the case.

Ms. Bayman is particularly effective in cases involving individual plaintiffs, including employment, sexual assault, harassment, and misconduct claims, where emotions run high and trust in the process is critical. Her mediation style balances empathy with realism. She allows parties to feel heard while remaining focused on the ultimate objective: resolution. She is persistent without being pushy, persuasive but not confrontational, and consistently focused on moving negotiations forward rather than declaring impasse prematurely.

Above all, Ms. Bayman’s mediation practice is focused on results. She brings credibility, business judgment, and emotional intelligence to the table—helping parties cut through noise, reassess risk, and close the deal.

AREAS OF CONCENTRATION

Employment

  • Discrimination and Harassment
  • Retaliation
  • Wrongful Termination
  • Reasonable Accommodation & Failure to Engage in the Interactive Process
  • Wage & Hour (Individual, Class and PAGA)

Sexual Assault / Misconduct

  • Sexual Assault & Battery
  • Sexual Misconduct
  • Revived Claims / #MeToo Matters

Personal Injury / Wrongful Death

  • Motor Vehicle, Trucking & Transportation Accidents
  • Premises & Product Liability
  • Construction Accidents

Entertainment / Media & Business

  • Chain of Title & Rights Disputes
  • Copyright, Trademark & IP Matters
  • Talent Engagement & Termination Disputes
  • Defamation, Rights of Publicity & Privacy
  • Contract & Business Disputes

EDUCATION

  • LL.M., Alternative Dispute Resolution | USC Gould School of Law
  • LL.B. | King’s College London

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

  • ADR Services, Inc., Mediator, 2026-Present
  • Lindsey Bayman Mediation, Mediator, 2022-Present
  • Kirtland & Packard, Of Counsel, Member of Plaintiff Trial Team, 2019-2021
  • Studio 8 (a Sony-Fosun joint venture), Chief Operations Officer; Head of Business Affairs, 2014-2018
  • Paramount Pictures, Executive Vice President, Motion Picture Business Affairs, 2006-2014
  • Pandemonium, Executive Vice President, Legal Affairs, 2002-2006
  • Phoenix Pictures, Head of Legal Affairs, 1995-2002
  • Gipson, Hoffman & Pancione, Senior Associate, 1992-1995
  • Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Mitchell, Associate, 1990-1992
  • Dentons, Associate, 1986-1990

PUBLICATIONS

  • Author, “You Say You Want a Resolution (But What You Really Want Is a Deal)”, Advocate Magazine (September 2024)
  • Featured in Los Angeles Daily Journal, Verdicts & Settlements, “Persuasive, Not Confrontational” (March 8, 2024)

MEDIATION PANELS

  • United States District Court, Central District of California
  • Los Angeles County Superior Court

Representative Cases

EMPLOYMENT

  • PAGA claim based on OSHA violations in combination with a wrongful termination claim. Employee truck driver was claiming he and employees of a trucking company were forced to operate in unsafe conditions, resulting in accidents. Plaintiff claimed he was wrongfully terminated as a result of one of those accidents. Defendant denied the unsafe working conditions and blamed plaintiff’s accident on speeding. Settled both PAGA and individual claims at mediation.
  • Employee terminated for absenteeism claiming wrongful termination, disability discrimination, failure to accommodate and failure to engage in the interactive process. Employee had an underlying medical condition that made COVID 19 exposure potentially life-threatening. Settlement was made more complex because plaintiff had been hired at the peak of the pandemic. Between quarantine and stays in the ICU, he had only worked a handful of days in the three months prior to his termination and his absences were sometimes unpredictable. Settled by a mediator’s proposal.
  • Claim for failure to accommodate and failure to engage in the interactive process brought by a long-term employee who was terminated after being injured on the job. Employer claimed it could not accommodate employee’s post-injury work restrictions. Given the length of tenure and the circumstances of the injury (which plaintiff blamed on defendant employer) plaintiff was highly emotional. Employer pointed to the substantial workers comp recovery and the extensive nature of the employee’s work restrictions. Settled by mediator’s proposal.
  • Wage and hour claim brought by a former employee driver of a large commercial trucking company. The mediation focused on the nuances of the complex interplay between state and federal law covering working conditions for commercial truck drivers. The mediation explored how the route of the driver and the origin and destination of the goods being transported might satisfy or fail to satisfy the “interstate commerce” definition required to trigger federal standards. Settled at mediation.
  • Plaintiff - a resident manager at an apartment building – was terminated for non-performance. Plaintiff claimed that while employed, she had been compensated solely by rental credit for the unit she resided in, but that the rental credit arrangement was not documented as required by law. Defendant had kept no time records and was facing exposure from claims that plaintiff worked many regular and overtime hours for which she had not been legally compensated. Post-termination, defendant had discovered that plaintiff had been pocketing cash rent payments from at least one tenant. In light of this theft, defendant was highly opposed to any offer any cash settlement. Case settled at mediation.

    SEXUAL ABUSE/MISCONDUCT

    • Revived sexual abuse claim involving the 1980’s sexual abuse of a minor. The case was complicated by the remoteness in time, influencing both the availability of reliable witnesses and of physical records which were not preserved electronically at that time. Also at issue was what types of indicators would have put the alleged perpetrator’s employer on notice – a key liability requirement – at that time and in that environment. The case was settled through a mediator’s proposal after several post-mediation exchanges with counsel.
    • Pre-litigation assault case against a celebrity who, claimant alleged, sexually assaulted her in a hotel corridor. No third-party witnesses or security footage of the assault were available, however there were witnesses who had given statements to hotel security that both claimant and respondent had been drinking heavily pool-side prior to leaving the pool area together. Highly emotional on both sides. Settled during mediation.
    • Former employee suing her former employer for aiding and abetting a sexual assault. Plaintiff was instructed by the employer to attend a business gathering of an important client who was known to throw wild parties. Plaintiff testified that she was overserved and then sexually assaulted by a party attendee off premises. Plaintiff also alleged that she was warned by an officer of the defendant employer not to make waves about the incident. Settled during mediation.
    • Sexual harassment/constructive termination case. Male bartender alleged he was repeatedly sexually harassed and assaulted by his male supervisor. Plaintiff claimed that after the supervisor’s conduct became physical, he complained to management but that management trivialized the complaint. Plaintiff claimed that the supervisor’s behavior continued to escalate in audacity and frequency until he had no choice but to quit his job. This case settled in mediation.

    ENTERTAINMENT

    • Copyright infringement claim by a UK author against a US entertainment company who had produced a movie based on the author’s novel. The author’s claim was based on an ambiguity in the drafting language of the rights agreement. The author had considerable leverage because the film was complete at the time the claim was received and, if successful, the claim could jeopardize its release. Settled at mediation.
    • Plaintiff claimed that a studio had produced a film using copyrighted elements from a treatment he had pitched to the studio years previously. The high budget film had been completed and, with a release date only weeks away, the studio had also expended substantial sums on marketing. The mediation centered around the complexities of the nature of the original submission, the studio’s evidence of independent creation, and the potential challenges in obtaining an injunction. The case settled after a second day of mediation.
    • A conflict arose between a US film company and its Chinese promotional partner who had paid to have a product featured in an upcoming film. This was a high-stakes conflict that was jeopardizing the film’s release in China – a huge theatrical market. While the dispute involved complex legal and jurisdictional issues, it was ultimately settled by focusing on the relationship issues. Once the promotional partner truly believed that there had been no intentional breach and that both companies were victims of the same, fraudulent, intermediary, they became open to solutions that resulted not only in a settlement, but in a robust and continuing business relationship.
    • Dispute between an actor and an entertainment company regarding an alleged breach of a nudity rider. This was an in-person mediation, which greatly helped in coming to resolution of this claim based on highly sensitive subject matter. Settled at mediation.
    • Dispute among multiple investors from different domestic and international jurisdictions involving the enforceability and effect of a security interest in the copyright of a film that was unperfected under US Law. The mediation involved the complex concepts of multi-jurisdictional independent film financing. Settled.

      Testimonials

      “Lindsey Bayman is one of the most effective neutrals with whom we have had the pleasure of working in recent history. She is detail-oriented on the risks of each matter and takes the time to get to know her clients and their pressure points. She is no-nonsense and has the tenacity to push where necessary and bridge what can seem like insurmountable gaps in negotiations. She has surprised our team on more than one occasion in resolving very difficult cases. She also is successful in addressing client and/or counsel control issues and convincing parties to see reason in the best interest of all involved. Overall, her dispute resolution strategies are creative and effective. As a bonus, she is a joy to work with. 10/10 recommend.”


      “We hired Lindsey Bayman for a complex matter involving three very entrenched parties and were not optimistic a settlement could be reached. But Lindsey quickly grasped all the issues – particularly the psychological dynamics at play – and expertly guided the discussion to resolution. Her ability to understand each litigant’s value perspective was especially impressive. I would absolutely recommend her for any difficult case.”


      “Lindsey Bayman is the right balance of patient, focused, and no-nonsense when the moment might call for it. In individual plaintiff employment cases, she has been highly effective. I’ve seen her work hard on both sides – she is a go-to for individual employment cases, in my book.”


      “Lindsey brings a valued combination of emotional intelligence and practical judgment to the process. With her active listening and professional approach, she quickly earned the trust of the parties and guided all toward a reasonable compromise.”


      “I had the opportunity to work with Ms. Bayman on one of the most challenging sexual-assault cases in my practice, involving significant emotional complexity and sensitive client dynamics. Her performance as a mediator was exceptional.

      Ms. Bayman demonstrated an extraordinary ability to create a safe, respectful environment while maintaining complete neutrality. She listened to my client with patience and genuine empathy, and she communicated the strengths and weaknesses of the case with clarity, honesty, and balance—without ever giving the impression that she was advocating for either side. Her trauma-informed approach and deep understanding of psychology were evident throughout the process and were critical in helping my client feel heard, respected, and grounded. She managed a highly charged mediation with skill and integrity, which significantly advanced the resolution process.

      Based on this experience, Ms. Bayman is now at the top of my list for sexual-assault and other sensitive cases involving difficult dynamics or emotionally vulnerable clients. I would highly recommend her services.”


      “We have hired Lindsey Bayman on several high exposure employment cases. She has the ability to cut to the key issues which settle cases – while not treading on our willingness to try any case. She comes to mediation well-prepared and very subject matter knowledgeable. She also has one of the most important skills for a mediator – she listens to the client and attorneys and does not assume that all attorneys want to settle all cases.”